Good
evening, 919 Gang. I made a terrible error last night, crediting Carl Larsen's
message about Stephen Covey to Roger Conlee. Big apologies to Carl and Roger
and to all the people I confused. I have edited the next two messages to remove
Roger's name and prevent repeating the error.
DON BAUDER writes:
I have no respect whatsoever for
Covey. I had to sit through a week of his utter quackery while I was at the
U-T. After the first hour I was fidgety and after the whole gruesome week I was
about to explode. Such banality. I am hearing for the first time that Bell
actually paid to bring this mush-maker in. Not surprised, actually. San Diego
had a guy named Blanchard who wrote One Minute Manager. I remember I wrote a
review before it even came out. I said it was jejune, but it would sell. For
once, I was right. The silly book sold by the millions. Pretty soon he was
following up with other One Minute tomes: One Minute Multi-Billionaire, One
Minute Atomic Physicist, etc.
P.S. I want to add one item to my
critique of Covey. The other day, I wrote that If 20% of respondents to my
columns and blog items don't call me a no good son of a bitch, I think I am
preaching to the choir. Craig Rose wrote to me and observed, "Just read
your missive to the 919 blog. And rest assured you're being modest. Far more
than 20% of the people who read (or know) you call you a 'no good son of a
bitch.'"
I wrote Craig back: "Craig: You
are right. I will send an 'in all fairness I erred' correction to Reber,
stating that 20% call me a no good son of a bitch, and 80% use stronger,
unprintable pejoratives. Thanks for pointing out my egregious error.
WELTON
JONES writes:
I always wondered if the management
folk actually enjoyed those cunning little games produced by those high-priced
hustlers while the rest of us struggled to get the paper out and maybe even
make it better.
REBER: I'll leave it up to each of the managers
who attended the Covey sessions as to whether they found them worthwhile. The
important thing to me is that the top brass at the U-T seemed to realize (for
the first time) that managing people requires some skill and that it was worth
time and money to try to improve those skills.
Gene Bell, president of the U-T at the
time, was night and day compared to previous people who had his chair. His
immediate predecessor is a fellow whose name I have forgotten, but I believe
"idiot" was the word Neil Morgan used to describe him at a staff
meeting, and this was before Helen Copley fired the idiot. Before that we had
Gary Goss, friendly enough if you ever got to see him, and perhaps competent.
I'll let others judge. Bell was the first top boss I recall (after Jim Copley)
who was really accessible to the staff. Unlike his predecessors, he actually
visited the newsroom. Imagine that. Sometimes he had someone he wanted to talk
to; sometimes he just wandered through the room, available to anyone. He also sat
in on a long series of small gatherings with staffers. He seemed
interested in us, and I can't say that
about the people who came before him.
----------------------------------------------
CRAIG MacDONALD writes:
The legendary and lovable Dick Desick,
an often quiet, modest man of wisdom, continually built his knowledge base by
reading dozens of newspapers that he would pluck from UT wastebaskets and
garbage cans during his daily wanderings through the building. If you were
lucky enough to have him reminisce, you were in for a real treat. He once told
me about covering a murder story in a remote area of LA. The LA Times reporter
was calling in the story from the only phone booth within miles, purposely staying
on the line so Desick couldn't file his. Dick went over and whispered something
in his photographer's ear, then the two ran to their car and sped off. The
Times reporter thought there was a new development and ran from the booth to follow
them. Desick drove around the block and raced back to grab the phone and meet
his deadline. In 1974, he looked at a story I was typing on a former POW, shook
his head and said, "It's too good for this paper!" On September
2,1978, he said he found a news clipping error while looking in a file for info
on "Ducks Unlimited." Someone had filed a story with the headline,
"Gov. Brown Ducks Reporters." Dick will always be part of all of us
lucky enough to have known him.
--------------------------------------------
KENT FREELAND writes:
There
have been some refererences lately by the Gang to Ellsworth Zahm.
He
was News Editor when I started on the news desk in 1978.
My
recollection is that he went on vacation to Hawaii and never returned.
Is
that accurate?
--------------------------------------------
RICK SMITH writes:
I missed some of the Ed Krueger stuff.
Quiet guy, dark hair. Did he marry a blonde copy girl whose father was Alan McGrew,
the San Diego Chamber of Commerce guy, originally out of Escondido?
REBER: I don't believe it is the same guy. Eddie was no loud-mouth, but I
wouldn't call him quiet. A happy, outgoing personality. I believe he was
married when he joined the Tribune, and that was long after you left.
-----------------------------------------------
PATRIC PETRIE writes:
Many thanks to Don Bauder (and you,
too, Jack) for the words of praise, which sadly, I was late to read being as it
was the morning after the night before. Oy. Never again. Jameson & red wine
do not mix, no matter what they say in Escondido!
Jack, you were right about Danny Boy,
as per Jimmy Thornton, which, by the by, I was always told was written by a
Jewish songwriter on New York's Tin Pan Alley. It is indeed a lovely song, one
of the best, and I have been known to warble a verse or two, usually at a wake.
Which is how I got in to the predicament at the beginning of my tale. But that's
another story.
By the way, the 919 lives! In one
short week I've had the opportunity to spend time with Don Bartletti, John
Gastaldo, Rick and Sylvia Shaughnessey and Ellen Duris, as well as wave hello
to Neil Morgan's old house, all of whom are doing well and the very picture of
health and happiness. Truly we are blessed, and better, for the experience of
knowing and working with each other.
-----------------------------------------
ROSE
MARIE SCOTT-BLAIR writes:
I got one of those "joke emails"
today that get sent 'round and 'round. Guess that the person who sent it must
have thought it was terribly funny, but to me, it was very sad.
The subject line was Technology
Marches On! And it read:
I was visiting my son and
daughter-in-law last night when I asked if I could borrow a newspaper.
"This is the 21st century, old man," my son said. "We don't
waste money on newspapers. Here, you can borrow my iPod." I can tell you,
that bloody fly never knew what hit it.
-----------------------------------------
JIMMY
THORNTON writes:
It’s always good to hear the younger
son Shamus report something good about a newspaper. He is visiting Chicago
friends and kin and seeing the sights and has enjoyed a cruise on the lake
while dining on the boat. Gives ice cream float a new meaning. In his latest
email, sent from a Starbucks as he sipped coffee, he praised a newspaper he had
been buying on the street. In his words: “I love the Chicago Tribune newspaper.
I've been picking it up, and reading much of interest in it. It is a great
paper. I rarely find so much of interest to read in a paper.” Perhaps others
are familiar with the newspaper and can comment on it, too. For the record:
Neither of my sons, Brendon nor Shamus, became newspapermen. They are very
successful with computer programming, none of which I fully understand. If I
push too hard for an explanation, they simply respond, “Byte me!” Just kidding
--------------------------------------
REBER:
Time to wish Happy Birthday (July 31) to Noel Osment. Enjoy your day, Noel.
P.O.
Box 2239
Ramona,
CA 92065
U.S.A.


