Saturday, March 31, 2018

Chuck bagged them


          Good evening, 919 Gang. It seems to me that every writer or photog covered one story that sticks in their memory and is worth sharing. Please tell us about it.
                                                
          CHUCK BOYD writes:
          My "Big Story" was a long, long search for a little boy missing for five days in a thickly-wooded mountainous area. He had wandered away from a church picnic.
          Search and Rescue crews combed the area and helicopters roared overhead. Day and night the search went on.
          I was at the police base camp, along with reporters from both papers. My "hat" would be the San Diego Union totally - until all its deadlines passed. Then I "switched hats" and became the Evening Tribune on-scene photographer.
          Stan Griffin was a bit upset that I was there so long but he didn't want to miss the story while switching photographers before the story played out.
          The boy was found, tired to exhaustion, dazed, hungry and covered with bug bites and bruises. When he was on a stretcher, being carried to an ambulance, a silly newly-arrived TV crew tried to jump in front of me and my camera, I did what had to be done after five long days and nights.
          The sturdy fiber case we had slung over a shoulder held flashbulbs and spare 4x4 film packets. It was heavy and when I swung it forward, it knocked the TV guys out of my way and I captured the tired but happy face of the rescued child. It made the front page of the Union.






         My other Big Story was when Jacques Cousteau's son was knocked unconscious while experimenting in the San Diego harbor using a parachute to see if he could float over a pod of whales for quiet aerial views, far from the towing boat. But, that is another story.

------------------------------------------------------------

          REBER: Last night we talked about Roger Showley’s last day at the U-T.

          MICHAEL GRANT writes:
          Roger Showley, your daily colleaguery was one of the best things about working at The Union.

------------------------------------------------------------

          REBER Last night Linda Murphy praised Jim Trotter for his days at the U-T.

          JIM TROTTER writes:
          Thank you, Linda. Very kind of you.

-------------------------------------------------------------

          ALAN MILLER writes:
          Jim Trotter is a pro who was immune to Chargers' hype while covering that sorry team.

---------------------------------------------------------------

          RICK SMITH writes:
          I've heard all the reasons about printing sites, deadlines, etc, but I'm compelled to bitch again about the Union's second-class citizenship. There was a callout today that said the Padres led, 5-3, in the eighth ining. The first seven inches of Acee's story was more like an off-day feature. I opened my L.A. Times and found a complete box score of the game, Brewers winning, 8-6. There were 11 complete box scores in the Times and five in the Union. Big picture of the Angels' Mike Trout being congratulated after a home run. Additional reconnaissance in the Times showed that the Angels won, 2-1, with Trout also scoring the winning run. Unrelated, there was a photo in the U-T of Mark Rypien, one of my favorite players when he was finishing up with the Rams. Rypien is identified in the caption but the former Redskins player, next to Rypen, is ignored. You see this lack of complete caption idents more and more often.
          Which humorously reminds of when I was with the Golden State Warriors in 1974. We're playing the Bucks in a playoff at Oakland Coliseum Arena when a fight breaks out. Milwaukee assistant coach Hubie Brown rushes the floor. Brown, who still is active with NBA telecasts, was identified in the San Francisco Chronicle as "unidentified fan."

---------------------------------------------------------------

          REBER: Suzanne Mack wrote last night about police shootings.

          JIM TROTTER writes:
          Suzanne Mack, sadly you are a reminder of why things are unlikely to get better. I could detail the ignorant and dangerous flaws in your logic, but why waste the time? You’ve made your position clear. Thanks for putting your white privilege on display for all to see.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

          DAVID FARMER writes:
          Some perfectly good words with long and honorable histories have been almost ruined by sloppy use in our times. For example, rhetoric. Most people would probably define it as over-elaborate speech, especially on political topics, and especially in a public address.
          Then an orator might throw in mild to total deception camouflaged by fancy words and false emotions. When some modern speakers are challenged on the truthfulness of their statements, their supporters may say, "Oh, that's just rhetoric."
          But the word originally meant the study and practice of oratory, and may still do so in college speech classes. In ancient Greece, there were acclaimed orators, or rhetoricians, some of them comparable to rock stars today. People would flock to their speeches. The content at times mattered less than how it was expressed.
          Some rhetoricians were so accomplished that their names have survived the centuries: Demosthenes of Greece, Cicero of Rome.
          And another Roman demonstrated both the eloquence of rhetoric and the deception that can be hidden inside: Marc Anthony of Rome. Shakespeare had him praising the newly murdered Caesar while simultaneously arousing the Roman crowd to hatred of his killers. It was rhetoric at its best.
          So never give the honorable title "rhetoric" to the dishonest words of a modern public speaker.



P.O. Box 2239
Ramona, CA 92065
U.S.A.

Friday, March 30, 2018

Roger's farewell


          Good evening, 919 Gang. The Union-Tribune said goodbye to Roger Showley today.

          PETER ROWE writes:
          Roger sent this message to the U-T late Friday, his last official day on staff:

          “Dear all:
          “It’s been amazing day with nonstop celebrations, topped by the biz teams’ HQ victory (earning us 14 cents each)! But it’s not really goodbye, because Jeff has something for me to do immediately and I’ll by on Tuesday for a UT150 committee meeting.
          “I’ve been associated with the UT since I was a 17-year-old high school senior in 1965 when I wrote my first story. I always wanted to be a journalist, except when I briefly thought of going to law school and decided against federal PR jobs in Washington.
          “This place seems like a little university, where everyone heads a department and one when that person leaves, it’s like a department has been closed down -- until someone revives it with a new twist.
          “I’ve had eight editors in my time and Diana’s the best immediate boss I’ve ever had. Jeff is the best editor we could ask for with his decisiveness and openness to new ideas. And you all are positive, collaborative and innovative. If any paper can pioneer new approaches to newspaper coverage, I think the UT can.
          “I look forward to seeing how we fare under the new ownership and to be part of it in one way or another. I also hope to launch a media literacy speakers bureau and outreach campaign with UT staffers available to spread the word of the work we do. We need all the allies we can get in the public – and from I can tell, our readers want us to succeed and appreciate our work.
          “Good luck, thanks for everything and here’s to the next 150 years!”

          CARL LARSEN writes:
          After receiving proclamations for his reporting from the Board of Supervisors and the San Diego City Council, U-T reporter Roger Showley ended a 44-year career last night with family, friends and colleagues at downtown’s Athens Market.


------------------------------------------------------

          LINDA MURPHY writes:
          A hearty congratulations to Jim Trotter for his latest career leap.
          I worked with Jim for only a short period of time in the Union sports department – my departure for Sonoma wine country cut short our time together – but I left with respect for how he went about his business. Sports Editor Barry Lorge had recruited a stable of young, mostly Ivy League reporters for the sports section, and the know-it-all egos of some grated on the more experienced staff.
          Jim was not one of those young egos. He began covering East County preps and worked his way up the traditional way, learning from those before him. I don’t know much about Jim’s ascendance after I left the Union in 1990, but I suspect hard work and collaboration had a lot to do with it. Good for him.

-------------------------------------------------------

          DAVID FARMER writes:
          Jerry Windle gave us an articulate essay about how shooting deaths at the hands of police are not always what they seem: sometimes the suspect was provoking officers in dangerous ways that we never see.
          I accept this, but I have one fundamental belief: most crimes don't merit the death penalty, least of all running from the police. Yet sometimes officers act as judges, juries and executioners. It's no excuse that they may be jangling with life or death hormones. They're supposed to control their emotions better than civilians do.
          I was once shocked to read that some police, after chasing a suspect by car or on foot, genuinely feel that the criminal (usually a criminal, I think) deserves a sound beating for putting officers and civilians in peril. There's that jury again.
          What should be done? Train police that if a fleeing suspect in a minor crime is not posing a danger to anyone, let him run. I can almost guarantee that he'll (usually a male) show up on the police radar again. And then arrest him when the good guys (as I believe almost every officer is) control the situation.
          In another aspect of the same issue, I believe that most police have now been trained not to fire at fleeing cars. There's just too much downside (innocent people inside, bystanders that could get hit by bullets or vehicles), when you consider that a car is virtually never going to evade the police for more than about 30 minutes. Helicopters and now drones can help see to that.
          In the case of a plausible threat of multiple deaths from a bomber, even I would unhesitatingly shoot. This despite the fact that I'm no fan of guns, believing that they should be tightly regulated,
          I think most citizens would endorse my central idea: don't kill a suspect if he (much less likely she) is not in the act of credibly threatening police or civilians with great bodily harm. Claiming that a cell phone is indistinguishable from a gun is going to find less acceptance in the era of body cams.

          SUZANNE MACK writes:
          Like many things in society today there appears to be (wow) two sides to every story. If I were to pitch a tent on the sidewalk and decided to take up residence there I'm pretty sure I'd be removed. If I lipped off to the officers and resisted I'd likely be spending the night at Las Colinas. Yet many homeless people do just that and are allowed to stay or asked to move on but don't comply.
          Okay, I am a young black man. Someone calls the police because they suspect I am breaking into cars in the night..... we've got a problem. Do I stop and explain my presence (It's my car or my grandmother's?) or do I take off running with something in my hand? The police shot and killed an Australian woman who had called 911. She surprised  them by running up to the driver's side window in the dark. Years ago the police shot a naked man who was armed only with a screwdriver in San Carlos. He was white. He was also crazy or on drugs. In that case I think a large net would have been more appropriate than a gun to bring him down.
          In the case of the black man in El Cajon (Alfred Alanzo?) he pulled out a good size silver vape
pen, took a shooting stance and "aimed" right at one of the officers. Do the officers wait for him to fire?
          I agree the police need to stop over-reacting to implied threats but I'm tired of reading and seeing stories that imply the victim was simply minding his own business and got shot dead by rogue police.
          This morning I heard Al Sharpton say Stephon Clark should not have been shot "for standing in his grandmother's back yard". The only thing Al got right was the location. This is not helping. Given the climate of unrest it's time to stop over-reacting (on both sides) and figure out a solution. Perhaps the young black men can stop giving attitude, becoming aggressive or running and the police can get a clue that they are not in danger when a suspect is running away.
          I do not know the mindset on either side but this has been going on for before the Rodney King case.
          Officers may just decide to err on the side of caution and not show up if the perpetrator is described as young, male and  black. I don't know what will come of all this but whitewashing the dead guy's life and actions after the fact isn't helping.
          Both of my daughters and I have been stopped by black officers. Maybe for a tail light out, speeding or a Hollywood stop at a corner. Never did any of us think to do anything but comply with them.

------------------------------------------------

          REBER: We have been diverted from a string that promised to be worthwhile. Please tell us about one story, news event, person you covered that was the most important or the most fun or the most embarrassing or the most …

P.O. Box 2239
Ramona, CA 92065
U.S.A.