Good evening, 919 Gang. I’m not
surprised by the outpouring of praise for John Gilmore, and I hope there is
more to come.
When a 919 Gang member dies, I do not
drop them from the mailing list. I hope that the deceased’s relatives are
checking his/her email and seeing how much that person was respected.
Share your memories, they are bound to
offer at least some comfort to those who have had a major loss.
JOHN CANNON writes:
John
Gilmore was a fraud.
An extraordinary fraud.
Sure,
he had that hard-bitten, hardcore edge. Or so he would have you believe. He
worked to perfect this public face, but talk to him for less than a minute, and
you saw his true self. He couldn’t hide a compassionate soul. He wanted to know
what story you were working on, what books you were reading, and what you
thought of this or that world development. You couldn’t help but admire his
hard-nose schtick. He seemed to revel in the game.
John was one of the first people I met
at the San Diego Tribune. When I arrived from freezing Chicago in February 1987
to interview for a night desk position, I had never been to Southern
California. I was apprehensive and unsure how I would fit into this strange
land. But John, a reporter filling in as desk editor that day, intercepted me
as I stumbled around and chose not to use the tough-guy act. He asked me about
my life, what Chicago was like and other stuff. Classic reporter trick – get
people talking about themselves to put them at ease. I felt at ease then, and
all the other time I spent with John. Sometimes, we didn’t even talk. We just
sat up in the fifth-floor cafeteria in Mission Valley and ate brown-bag lunches
while we read.
He could be blunt because, you know,
you have to keep up appearances. He played guard on the Ramona High School
basketball team (it was a few years ago), and during a game at the Army and
Navy Academy in Carlsbad, the cadets were riding the Bulldogs mercilessly.
Eventually, John had had enough and flipped off the home crowd, an uncommonly
coarse act in those days.
“I’m not proud of that,” he told me at
least three times over the years.
Once, I bought an older Toyota Corolla
from John at a price he set ridiculously low. When I got into the car to drive
it home, I saw a bottle of Peachy Canyon red wine in the passenger seat with a
ribbon around its neck, a gift to mark the sale. Who does that?
Gruff. Yeah, sure.
John,
I’ll miss you more than I can explain.
-----------------------------------------------
ANNE
KRUEGER writes:
John
Gilmore had a wry self-deprecating humor that I always enjoyed in the years
that I knew him. This is my favorite John Gilmore story.
In the
early 2000s, John was working in Mission Valley and I was in the East County
bureau. I didn’t see him often, but we had a good relationship.
Imagine
my surprise when one day on our internal messaging system, I got a message from
John that started out “Hey scum bucket.” I couldn’t imagine what I had done to
bring that about. I called John, and he had meant to send the message to Eddie
Krueger, who was listed as EKRUEGER in our messaging system, while I was
AKRUEGER. John and I laughed about it.
A few
weeks later, I got another message from John that started out “Hey dirtbag.”
Once again, he had sent me a message he intended for Eddie.
Since
then, it became a running joke between us. Whenever I met John, I would greet
him with “Hi scum bucket” and he would respond “Hey dirtbag.” The greetings
were said with great affection.
John
was the nicest dirtbag scum bucket I've ever known.
LESLIE WOLF BRANSCOMB writes:
I'm
sorry to hear about John Gilmore. I didn't realize he was in poor health, because
you recently posted that he joined you for lunch in Ramona. He was a great boss
when we were in the El Cajon bureau together. And yes, the curmudgeonly thing
was an act. He's one of the sweetest, nicest people I've ever met. We crossed
paths when he was at the Port of San Diego, but I haven't seen him in years.
Despite that, when my husband was
going through his cancer journey in 2018-2019 he sent me a very nice email
about his prostate cancer experience, and gave me and Max some thoughtful
advice, uplifting encouragement, and offered to be available for any help.
I last
heard from him about a year ago, when I was pondering in the 919 about who I
would be and what I would do after retirement. That post prompted a lot of
financial advice (I have financial advisors I inherited from my parents, so
that's all taken care of, thank you) and an eye-opening number of stories from
919ers who "retired" only to go on to greater career heights as
teachers, lawyers, freelancers, book authors, sailors, etc. John sent me a kind
email saying, you know, it's okay to just enjoy your retirement and not feel
like you have to keep working to attain greater accomplishments. If you would
like to spend your time watching old movies, catching up on all the novels you
want to read, puttering in the garden, going to the beach to watch the sunset,
spending time with family or lunching with friends, that's fine. That's what I
do. You earned your retirement, so enjoy it!
P.S. -- I'm still not retired. Turned
65 last June and it kind of crept up on me and I didn't even think about it
until I got letters from Milliman (the U-T) and the City of Chula Vista saying
it's time to start taking your pension. So I planned to retire at the end of
2025, then put it off due to work obligations, then set the date at the end of
March, and now my government employer is asking me to postpone until July 1,
the start of the new fiscal year, to make it all tidy (and make sure they don't
lose funding for my position in the next fiscal year.) Ugh. Discussions are
ongoing.
EMMET
PIERCE writes:
I'm very sorry to learn of John
Gilmore's death. He was a solid journalist and a supportive editor. Always calm
and thoughtful, John was a very good listener. He was well-liked by his
colleagues. I got to know John when I covered the Grossmont Union High School
District in the late 1990s. He was the education editor.
ALAN
MILLER writes:
John Gilmore , as many mourners will
confirm, was one of the most decent colleagues one ever encountered. A
consummate professional, his manner was unflappable. I spoke with him at home a
couple of weeks ago and we talked for 30 minutes or so. I was stunned to learn
he had a terminal disease, having recovered several years ago from a stroke.
John calmly accepted his fate and was grateful that he had lived a good life
and that his family had been so supportive. May this thoroughly gentle man RIP
and God bless his family.
DAVID
OGUL
writes:
"Never
put off until tomorrow what can be done today."
That
thought came rushing back upon reading the devastating news about John Gilmore.
John and I were more than co-workers or casual acquaintances. I was honored to
be known as a friend. While at the U-T, we spoke daily, not about office
politics, but about family, faith, and loss. Our friendship really took off
when the San Diego Trolley extended what became known as the Green Line under
San Diego State and we both began commuting to the Mission Valley office by
light rail daily, John boarding in East County and me at the 70th Street
station. John always asked about my wife and kids, my mom, and what trips I
might be planning. More often than night, morning conversations would continue
on the trolley ride back home.
We kept
in touch after we were unceremoniously let go during the demise of what once
was a damn good newspaper, and I last saw John about a year ago when we met for
lunch at DZ Aikins. Just a couple of weeks ago, I told myself I needed to call
John and set up another lunch.
"Never
put off until tomorrow what can be done today."
KAREN KUCHER writes:
I was
so sad to read about the passing of John Gilmore, whom I first met during my summer
internship. He later was my editor and was always quick to offer writing tips
and encouragement, although the feedback sometimes was delivered with his
trademark curmudgeon-in-training demeanor.
He
famously growled at me one day when I was dawdling over a crime brief he needed
to edit: "You don't have to solve the murders, Kucher, you just have to
write about them."
He was
kind and thoughtful. He once dropped me a note after meeting my daughter, who
he said struck him as "a very sweet girl." He added: "And I
surmise she is smart, funny, feisty and can be strong-willed. Perhaps she takes
after her mom." That backhanded compliment still makes me smile.
We
stayed in touch with occasional lunches or calls after he went on to the port
and then retirement, but not as often as I would have liked.
RIP
John, you'll not be forgotten.
CARL
LARSEN writes:
I
thought Mike Burge did a masterful job of presenting the John Gilmore I knew.
I was
John’s boss for important years in his career, yet I feel like a guy who
holds only three pieces of a larger, complex puzzle that I’m unable to put
together, but each piece I possess is a piece of gold.
Here’s
hoping that a collective 919 effort from others holding the other puzzle
pieces - spanning more than 59 years at Copley and beyond - gives us a full
picture of John as a father, colleague and friend, ornery at times but
compassionate, understanding and thoughtful at heart.
I
don’t have the memory power to pull up stories he worked on, both as a reporter
and later as assistant metro editor shepherding a score of reporters. But I do
remember John had a special interest in stories about social welfare, both as a
reporter and editor, and as an education and military editor.
Post-merger,
John took one of the earliest buyouts that signaled the start of the
U-T’s long decline.
I
remember his agonizing on whether to leave after 39 Copley years, even with an
offer of a pile of money. What would he do? Could he pay the bills?
All
those worries disappeared shortly after he left when Irene Jackson, I
believe, hired him for a p.r. job at the Port District.
I am
so glad we kept our connection alive - a birthday dinner in his honor that
Sharon and I invited him to at East County Anthony’s, his presence at our 25th
anniversary bash on Shelter Island ( a journey that was hard for him to
make), and an East County dinner at Pietro’s near Grossmont Center. And
sharing our heart-healthy recipes by phone.
A week
ago I called John; he was in good spirits, and he was concerned about my
respiratory problems that mimicked some of his.
A
minute after hanging up, he sent me an Amazon link to a room air cleaner he
used and recommended.
Cherished
times all.
Let’s
all help finish that puzzle.
DAVID GADDIS SMITH writes:
John’s
appearances would bring a smile to my face — such a warm, kind and opinionated
soul … I’m looking forward to reading 919 tributes to him.
GINA
LUBRANO writes:
John
Gilmore, faux curmudgeon, will be missed greatly by all of us who laughed at
the carefully curated crusty act and saw him for who he truly was. May he rest
in peace.
ANNE
KRUEGER writes:
’I’m
so sorry to hear that. John was a great guy. I’ll miss him.
STEVE SCHMIDT writes:
I’m
sorry to read about the passing of John Gilmore. He was my boss for several
years and was always a gentleman and a crackerjack editor. We met for
lunch a couple times in recent years. It was great to see him so engaged in
life, even with his health challenges, and to get his wine recommendations
(Kirkland Signature Malbec!) He was all aces.
TOM GABLE writes:
I had
the good fortune to have John as a friend, going back to our days at the
Tribune. It continued when I moved into PR, and then after he left the paper
and got into the PR business at the Port, where he excelled. We would have
lunch on occasion; it was always fun with his wry wit and Cheshire grin, sharing
stories from the paper and the town.
He had a sharp critical eye, too, and
I would run things by him for input. This included for PR articles and when I
started writing a column on Substack. He provided links to some great resources
for bright quotes. He edited my farewell blog when I retired from PR, greatly
improving it, and I was pleased that he and Bill Osborne joined the
festivities.
John had a good eye for wine values,
too. He would email me with finds from his latest Costco forays. I thought he
was going to be around much longer after Jack reported that John had visited
him in Ramona. Everyone is saddened by John’s 30 message but probably smiles a
little thinking about him crafting it. A great guy. His celebration of life
should be memorable in so many ways. Cheers to John and his memory!
BERNIE HUNT writes:
As an ACE at the Trib., I worked in
close harness with the remarkable John Gilmore and we became good friends. I am
saddened, indeed, to learn of his death. He was a consummate journalist and a
good man.
SUSAN WHITE writes:
John
sent me a lovely note after Bob died, and we talked about getting together
someday. Just yesterday Dave Hasemyer and I were talking about going to see
Jack and inviting John, too. For me, John's sudden death is a poignant reminder
that we shouldn't delay spending time with the people we care about. If we do,
all those somedays too easily become never.
-------------------------------------------
ROBIN
KLEVEN DISHON writes:
A
belated thank you to you, Jack, for sharing the news that Lupe Quiroz had
passed away. Also, many thanks to Rob Krier for his delightful recounting of
their friendship, and to Michelle Carlin and George Varga, both of whom reached
out to me on Facebook with the sad news. Lupe (Lulu to me) was a dear friend
during all my years at the newspaper and long after. I'll forever miss her
marvelous laugh, her quick wit, her gorgeous smile and her wonderful hugs.
----------------------------------------------------
JIM
GOGEK writes:
Regarding Dave Hasemyer's post on U.S.
guns in Mexico, the more things change... I wrote the opinion article below 32
years ago (who says journalists can't do math?), and it's even more true today!
An amazing factor is that in the 1980s and '90s, Tijuana had less violent crime
than San Diego, that Mexico was a safe place. The appetite by US citizens for
drugs and guns has caused the violence in Mexico today. We are
responsible.
The words of 19th century Mexican
dictator Porfirio DÃaz have never been more true -- "Pobre México, tan
lejos de Dios y tan cerca de los Estados Unidos"
“Illegal U.S. guns export
violence to Mexico
By JIM
GOGEK June 6, 1994 Publication: San Diego Union-Tribune, The (CA) Page: A-2
Word Count: 770
Getting
tough on illegal immigrants from Mexico is all the rage this year. But nobody's
paying attention to a lethal cargo being smuggled the other way across the
border: guns.
It's
no surprise that the handgun used to kill a Mexican presidential candidate,
Luis Donaldo Colosio, in Tijuana in March or the assault rifles used to gun
down a Roman Catholic cardinal in Guadalajara last year came from the United
States. And it's very likely the AK-47 used to
murder Tijuana Police Chief Jose Federico Benitez Lopez in April was purchased
in the United States and smuggled into Mexico.
Thousands
of weapons, from handguns to machine guns, are smuggled from the United States into
Mexico each year. Guns are virtually illegal in Mexico. Gun shops don't exist
there.
The
export of illegal guns, coupled with a growing drug trade, is beginning to
corrupt Mexico's traditionally safe society. Although Tijuana's reputation
north of the border has long been besmirched, it has far less violent crime
than San Diego. Mexico City, with more than 20 million people and many
extremely impoverished neighborhoods, has much less crime than American cities
a fraction its size.
But
the safety of those cities is being marred by violence that's shocking by
Mexican standards, usually shootouts between drug traffickers and federal
agents or drug-related executions. The gunning down of the police chief has
left Tijuana reeling, and its people angry, but it's only the
most recent nightmare of gunfire.
On
March 3, bullets raked a busy Tijuana boulevard in front of a crowded swap meet
when federal agents confronted a car carrying a top drug lieutenant and his
bodyguards. During the battle, another car full of gunmen ambushed the federal
agents. When it was over, five people lay dead in the street, including a top
federal drug agent. It turned out that several bodyguards were Baja state
police officers, moonlighting for drug traffickers.
Most
of the weapons seized in that battle came from the United States. Weapons
smuggled into Mexico from the United States have been found from one end of the
country to the other. In the southern state of Chiapas, several guns seized
from Zapatista rebels after the Jan. 1 uprising were traced to the United
States. In Baja California last year, a drug raid netted 179 weapons from the
United States, including four M-60 U.S. military machine guns.
Mexico
recently began providing some information on smuggled weapons to the U.S.
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. In 1992, Mexican authorities
identified 5,351 guns from the United States, and last year 3,376, although
officials on both sides of the border say the real
number of weapons is far higher. Even foreign-made weapons seized in Mexico are
believed to be smuggled through the United States.
Most
weapons smuggled into Mexico are high-powered handguns, many of which come from
a small number of gun dealers near the border, according to an unreleased ATF
study. Since there are few restrictions on selling guns in the United States,
many smuggled weapons are purchased through want ads or at weekend gun fairs,
according to ATF officials.
Smuggling
guns into Mexico isn't difficult. A straw man purchases guns from a legitimate dealer
and turns them over to a smuggler, who takes them across the border. While cars
crossing from Mexico into the United States are heavily scrutinized, travelers
in the other direction usually are not. Smugglers often just drive into Mexico
with a trunk full of guns.
The
ATF is virtually powerless to halt this smuggling because the gun purchases
here are perfectly legal. Mexican officials want U.S. help to stem the flow of
illegal weapons. But with our lax laws on gun dealers and gun sales, that won't
happen.
Enacting
sensible gun laws in the United States would do a lot to stop the flow of
weapons into Mexico.
The
Gun Violence Protection Act of 1994, also known as Brady II, would enact
handgun registration, limit the sale of handguns to one per month, require a
federal license for ownership of more than 20 guns and prohibit the sale of
guns anywhere except at legitimate gun shops. Right now, 90 percent of
federally licensed gun dealers, including those along the border, don't have
shops and instead sell weapons from the trunks of their cars or over their kitchen
table. Brady II, co-sponsored by Rep. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., also would make
it illegal to sell guns through want ads or at gun fairs.
Illegal
immigration from Mexico has become the political snake oil of the 1990s. But
when Americans complain about all the problems Mexican immigrants are causing
here, they should consider how our nation, overflowing with guns, is illegally
exporting murder and violence to Mexico.