Good evening, 919 Gang. A note of no
significance: Two days before the Poway shooting our son, an Escondido cop,
pulled the young shooter over for speeding. Said he was pleasant, well-mannered
– looked like a typical college student.
RON
HUTCHERSON
writes:
A troubled man shoots and kills.
Anti-gun blather erupts like pimples on a chocoholic teenager. It's misguided,
misleading and simplistic. These United States do not have much of a gun
problem. They have monumental mental public health and societal challenges.
Consider proportionality briefly. The
CDC reports 39,773 firearm related deaths in 2017. Wikipedia reports 44,965
recorded suicides in 2016. About 24,000 involved firearms. The Anti-Defamation
League says extremists killed 50 people in 2018, 42 of them with guns. The
majority of the killers were white supremacists (crackpots to me) .
Those numbers are on the benign
side--serious and awful nevertheless.
A multi-year study by Johns Hopkins
University found that 250,000 people in the U.S. die from medical errors each
year. The Insurance Journal reports that 41,100 people died in traffic
accidents on America's roads in 2017 and 40,327 in 2016. Further, it's
estimated that texting behind the wheel took 3,477 lives and injured 391,000 in
2015.
Then there is the opoid problem, which
the CDC says caused 72,287 deaths in 2017. From a study covering 2006-2010,
alcohol was blamed for 88,000 deaths a year. Worse, the CDC blames cigarettes
for 480,000 deaths a year in the USA. I won't even try to detail failures at
the dinner table such as diabetes and obesity.
These numbers provoke questions such
as why do they drink? Smoke? Text? Why don't hospital workers pay attention to
sanitation? Why do we sell cigarettes? Why do we facilitate all sorts of drug
abuse? Profit, probably.
The National Institute of Mental
Health estimates that 11.2 million Americans suffer from serious mental
illness, that is, illness that can result in harm to self. How many of those,
or their 30 million plus who have lesser mental issues, turn to drugs, alcohol,
tobacco, erratic or overly aggressive driving to calm down, get through the
day, or let off steam? How many kill themselves? How many see others as devils
who should be exterminated? How many "lose it" and kill family in
fits of rage? How many get treatment?
Scapegoating guns and seeking to
eliminate them won't get us very far in our quest for a kinder and gentler
society (to borrow words). We need to seek real answers in mental health
treatment, job stress reduction, protection from financial embarrassment or
disaster, undue social expectations foisted on all of us by advertisers and
ambitious parents. We need to court a Healthy Society.
GLENN
GRANT
writes:
Jack, I thought we were not supposed to get
political here. I find the comment about Trump that Lisa Petrillo threw into
her thoughts on the subject to be gratuitous and political. Even if
Trump did say that (and I never saw the proof he did, although I would gladly
accept it), the Border Patrol agent’s actions with his own or a service revolver
certainly did help save the day. He might not have struck the fleeing suspect,
but his bullets hit the vehicle and certainly must have given the suspect the
knowledge that he was being chased, and had little chance of escaping. I’m sure
I could find all sorts of quotes from politicians on both sides of the issue,
but Lisa chose only Trump’s, which hardly shows a diversity of opinions, which
I thought we all wanted.
I feel awful for the suspect’s family, and I know
it hits home that Lisa has had some of them in her house. And I appreciate how
difficult it can be for parents to supervise five kids who want nothing more
than to have privacy online, whether on a computer, tablet, or phone. However,
I know from personal experience that it is absolutely essential to know what
your kids are doing online. No privacy, no hidden passwords, no secret chats.
Possibly even use a keystroke logger to track where they’ve been. They live
under your roof, and are under your control, even at age 19. When my son
started getting online around 1992 in his sub-teens, we told him he had to
leave the bedroom door open and the screen facing it, so we could see what he
was doing. He protested mightily, and we eventually had to pull the plug on
him. When I viewed his browser history, I was horrified to see the kinds of
sites he was visiting. So that was it. No web surfing unless we were sitting
right next to him, and the power cable was unplugged and removed from the PC
and his room when we weren’t there. Of course there were other ways he could
access the Web outside the home, but at least he knew the rules at our place.
So please don’t expect “the forces of constant vigilance that I always assumed
spied on our every keystroke” to be able to monitor every hate-filled would-be
terrorist out there. It just isn’t possible.
Regarding security: I know someone who worked
many years at a Jewish nonprofit in town. They did, and possibly still do,
receive phone and email threats regularly. They have one or two security
guards, sometimes armed, sometimes not, stationed at one or two entrances.
However, there are several other unguarded entrances that could be easily
breached. In fact, this institution even gave out blueprint-style guides when
it opened to help visitors get around. My friend was always nervous that a
shooter or bomber would easily get past the guards. The excuse was that the
nonprofit didn’t have the budget for more robust security. That may be true,
but unfortunately today, heightened security should be a priority at most such
institutions or houses of worship. Trained armed personnel might not have
stopped the Poway killer, but they certainly could have slowed him down or
tackled him. I say the more trained armed security personnel the better. But I
am in agreement that no one except trained police and military personnel should
have access to assault rifles.
Finally, I agree that the start to finding an
answer to gun violence is more and better mental health care. Most of these
shooters seem to have some kind of mental health issue, and we should be
devoting more funds and resources to treating them. A very difficult task, and
as long as each state or city has the right to enact its own gun laws, it will
take a long time to solve it.
REBER: We’ve veered as far into politics as we’re going to go. I suggest we
have a First Amendment problem as well as a Second Amendment one. Just being a
Facebook user, I see an incredible amount of hatred expressed. Lay that on an
impressionable kid, then give him access to a machine made for killing bunches
of people and you have the ingredients for disaster.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PRESTON
TUREGANO
writes:
Behold the 1,000-foot-long, 3,800-passenger
cruise ship Norwegian Joy, which is two years old and was taken out of the
Asian market to sail from Los Angeles, Seattle and Vancouver (B.C.) to the
Mexican Riviera, Hawaii, Alaska and West Coast. Bob and I drove to the Port of
Los Angeles to do an overnight on it Monday into today. It’s the biggest cruise
ship we have ever sailed. To me, it looked like an office building that has
been moved to atop a barge. Thousands of travel agents (and one guest each)
were invited (gratis) for the sailing from LA to Ensenada, Mexico, and back
this a.m. The good: nice cabins and best cruise ship bathroom layout I have
ever seen. Small closet space, too. There are 19 restaurants on board to choose
from, and almost as many bars. The bad: you do wait and wait for an elevator.
Most of them are usually packed with passengers anytime day or night. At the
Savor restaurant, we each had lobster tails, and we wanted to share some Beef
Wellington, which was too well done, so we sent it back, only for another piece
to be done ever more than the rejected slice. We wanted a pink slice, but could
not get “medium” across. Most of the crew is Asian and many do not speak
English well. After dinner, we went to the ship’s theater to see a full-fledged
almost 2-hour production of the musical “Foot Loose.” Extremely well performed
and dripping Broadway quality. Sadly, the fine cast was not identified in any
flyer, booklet or poster. (I suspect that’s because the show is probably not an
Actors Equity – labor union – sanctioned production, and the cruise line
perhaps is not paying royalties for the rights to produce the show. This has
been going on for many years on cruises.) I formally protested the cast slight
to the ship “Manager.” The Cruise Director – “Dan Dan” -- was just a voice we
would hear over a PA system. Never saw him.
The most amazingly impressive things were:
virtual reality “rides,” a go-cart track with real go carts, and a water slide
tube that hangs partially over the starboard side of the back of the ship. This
morning, the captain and a pilot and two tugs navigated the ship into narrow
San Pedro (Port of L.A.) Harbor backwards. The ship would not have been able to
sail in bow-first and then turn around to dock. The most troubling thing:
disembarkation was a nightmare and not well organized. Again, language
problems. Can’t imagine what a multi-day cruise on the Joy would be like. It’s
just too big and intimidating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NICK
CANEPA
writes:
Saw a photo of the AP Stylebook and it got me
to wondering how many people remember Howard Welty's Evening Tribune Stylebook.
Don't remember how long it lasted or if any still are around.
REBER: I have
one, Nick. It was published in June, 1971. It has 61 pages plus pages I wrote
for the Sports Desk and punched so they could be inserted in this loose-leaf
book. Howard, one of my favorite people, also issued some supplementary pages.
Here’s an excerpt from one:
“QUESTION – We have changed ‘synagogue’ to ‘synagog’.
Should we change ‘travelogue’ to ‘travelog’?
“ANSWER – Holy jumped up jesus, NO! This is a question of current usage and applies only to
the word mentioned. (Don’t go applying logic to the language. Col. McCormick
tried this and learned the hard way.)”
---------------------------------------------------------------------
DAVID
FARMER writes:
When
you see prehend in a word you know something is being grasped. If you
comprehend something, you're grasping it. If you apprehend someone, you're
clutching him or her in the sense of detaining. Or you can apprehend the
meaning of something.
If
you have a prehensile tail or hand, you can hold on with it. Of course,
elephants have prehensile noses and giraffes have prehensile tongues. Possums
have prehensile tails. Some creatures even have prehensile lips. People and
apes have prehensile hands, or feet in the case of the latter. We gave up our
prehensile feet in exchange for walking on them.
And
here's one I've never seen: prehensile, greedy or excessively intent on
acquiring something. Rare: a person gifted with a keen intellect.
The
root generally means prae, before; and hendere, seize or take.
This
list is not meant to be comprehensive. I only wanted us all to grasp various
meanings.
P.O.
Box 2239
Ramona,
CA 92065-0938
United
States


