Friday, March 31, 2017

Grist for the mill



          Good evening, 919 Gang. Jay Johnson says he’s found wording that would have been easier than his methyolade reference. Maybe. But easier isn’t better. Look at all the responses we’ve had to that reference. I love lots of copy. It keeps the ads from bumping into each other.

          JAY JOHNSON writes:
          Instead of methyolade, it would have been much easier had I written:
          "That stingy red stuff that your mom would put on your scrapes using that little glass wand with a bulb at the tip that she'd get out while you were going ow-ow-ow and when she put it on it became OWEEE-OWEEE-OWEEE and then she'd blow on it to make it better and put on a gauze bandage or Band-Aid depending on the size of the scrape, which would get stuck to the wound and have to be pulled off the next day taking part of you with it and she'd repeat the process again for a few days until a scab formed and when it was almost healed you'd fall down and scrape it again and everything would start over."
          That would have been much easier.

          DAVID FARMER writes:
          I'm afraid I have to disagree with Jim Okerblom's meticulously reasoned monograph on liquids that can be legally used to torture children.
          When I or one of my three brothers would sustain a scrape or cut (which was daily), my mother had two choices for a disinfectant. (It was a Hobson's Choice as far as we were concerned, because either one was going to sting.)
          Contrary to what Jim and Jay Johnson contended, one of the two liquids was muh CURA crome. It left a red-orange stain on the skin (or anything else it touched before it was dry). It stung, but at least you ended up with a highly visible red-orange badge of courage.
          To my greater disappointment, J&J completely ignored the other old standby: iodine. Jim is probably going to tell us that iodine was yanked from store shelves because it retarded brain growth. I vigorously reject that as a base Cunard. In iodine's defense I'll point out that it, too, left evidence of a (child's) war wound. I can't remember which preparation stung worst.
          I don't recall much about the following incident because of shock. But I'm reasonably sure it involved disinfectant. One day my brother Don was whittling a piece of wood in our yard. He said something so insulting to me that I felt I had to strike him. It was at this point that he stabbed me!
 Well, that's my version. His is that he raised his hand to ward off my blow. Unfortunately, he was still holding his knife in that hand. The blade sank into the heel of my hand and I still bear the scar.
          It's well known that the testimony of eyewitnesses can vary dramatically. Also established is that the history of war is whatever the victor says it is. I hereby declare myself the victor of the Battle of Whittling Field. And by golly, he stabbed me!
          (The knife incident really happened.)
                                              
          REBER: A good story, but Jim Okerblom did list Mercurochrome as one of the first-aid treatments.

          RICK SMITH writes:
          Merthiolate burned more than Mercurochrome, as I remember.

-------------------------------------------------------------

          PRESTON TUREGANO writes:
          I found my eight Guild contract books going back to 1967-70 through April 1992. I signed on as an employee in late 1970. Employee’s birthday was a holiday when I started at The Evening Tribune. Employee’s anniversary was added in 1985. As far as I can determine, Copley News Service was never in the Guild Bargaining Unit. (Each contract began by defining “Bargaining Unit.”) The 1985-’88 pact was negotiated on behalf of the Guild by Michele Davis, John Edgington, Rick McCarthy, Mark Monday, Bob Kemp and me. Ollie Peter, G.A. “Woody” Wood and Robert J. Robinson were the U-T negotiators. Unfortunately, the Guild was decertified in 1998 when members of Local 95 voted 406-378 to end 61 years of representation. (Yep, 28 votes decided the future.) Despite that action, Employee’s birthday and anniversary continued as holidays along with New Year’s Day, Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day (Dump the Guild, but still take some bennies obtained for you by organized labor), Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day at least through 2006, when I retired.

          MICHEL DAVIS writes:
          Regarding Diane Kiesel's remark regarding birthday holidays while working for Copley in DC. The answer is simple. They were not covered by a Guild contract. As far as how long the birthday holiday existed, I do not know when it was first negotiated. I started working for Copley in 1972 and it was a benefit in the Guild contract at that time.

          REBER: The birthday was a holiday at least as early as 1967. At that time the Guild contract said the employee and supervisor could work out when to take the holiday, but it had to be in the week of the birthday. As I recall, that rule lapsed or was ignored and people sometimes stored that holiday for later use.

          BARBARA MOSS writes:
          If an employee was at the top of their pay grade, they couldn't receive a pay raise. However, they could be given a lump sum amount all at once that equaled a nice raise. Another trick was to change a non-management position to a management position. This would mean a higher pay grade and more money for the lucky employee. The editor and HR could always find a way around the rules.

          REBER: The only thing I knew about a pay ceiling was when I hit it. I can’t recall this ever being explained. I could be wrong. This was a post-Guild phenomena, as I recall. There were pay scales for each job, and they were raised, maybe every year but certainly every two years. As Barbara says, Newsroom management was often successful in ducking the limitation. I should have asked about the title of my job. I definitely was the only person in that classification.

-----------------------------------------------------------

          REBER: We’ve been talking about movies which don’t move us as much today as they did when first released.

          RICK SMITH writes:
          East Rider's ending was typical of some of those 'sixties-seventies "counterculture" movies. The Band and its version of "The Weight" (part of the background music) are among my all-time favorites, but what did these lyrics mean: "I pulled into Nazareth, feeling about half past dead."  Nazareth, Israel, or Nazareth, Pa., which happens to be Mario Andretti's home town?
          "Don't crack wise to me, flatfoot," said Agent Polk (Dana Elcar) to Lt. Snyder (Charles Durning) in "The Sting."

          DAVID OGUL writes:
          Anyone who finds Blazing Saddles unfunny and unwatchable is un-American. SAD! What are we going to go after next? Young Frankenstein? Animal House? Have you no shame, Mr. Johnson? Have you no shame?!

          REBER:  We bought our first VCR so we could play Blazing Saddles. It cost $600.
         
          TOM GABLE writes:
          I still enjoy "This is Spinal Tap", "Young Frankenstein" and "Caddy Shack". If you haven't seen it, Spinal Tap is a great send up by Rob Reiner of the rockumentaries of the 1970s, which followed bands around recording their wisdom between gigs. It is known for the line about why their music was louder than other bands: because their amplifier went up to 11, instead of 10. Other fine one-liners from the movie wouldn't make it past the editor. And there are many.

------------------------------------------------------

          DAVID FARMER writes:
          Did anyone else notice a typo in the illustration of tonsil maladies a couple of days ago? Here's a hint: it appears between "uvula" and "tongue," much as a nornal tonsil does. I'm surprise the mistake hasn't gone viral.


--------------------------------------------------------

          LESLIE WOLF BRANSCOMB forwards:
          Here's something for your April 1st (or 3/31) 919 report... for all of us who still care about spelling. (Though I did need to have my 19-year-old explain to me that Rolaskatox is a reference from the RuPaul's Drag Queens reality TV show...)



P.O. Box 2239
Ramona, CA 92065
U.S.A.

Methylate is a myth



          Good evening, 919 Gang. Okay, let’s get this mess over with early:

          JIM OKERBLOM writes:
          I think Jay Johnson meant Merthiolate, rather than methylate, as the antiseptic he remembers from his childhood. Merthiolate is Eli Lilly's trade name for thimerosal, a compound containing mercury and sodium. Thimerosal is still used before surgery to disinfect skin. It was also once widely used as a preservative in vaccines, but was removed because of unsubstantiated claims linking it to autism. I remember Merthiolate well from my childhood, along with Mercurochrome, a trade name for a compound containing mercury and bromine. Both were red, I think, and came in small bottles with glass applicators. As I recall, both burned when applied to a cut, but one was much worse than the other. I can't remember which was more painful. I think both fell from use because they contain mercury, and because antibiotic ointments are more effective.
          Sodium methylate, according to Google, is "a white, free-flowing, flammable powder, CH 3 ONa, decomposed bywater to sodium hydroxide and methyl alcohol: used chiefly in organic synthesis." Whatever that means.

          REBER: I suspect you are correct, Jim, but an editor’s creepy hand worked into this picture. Jay wrote “methyolade.” Creepy-handed editor changed it to “methylate.” Apparently both were wrong. That editor apologized profusely even before he was docked a day’s pay.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

          DAVID FARMER writes:
          Bob Laurence found "Easy Rider" to be boring. Some films are best seen in the era in which they were made. "Easy Rider" is one of them. I watched the 1969 movie for the first time maybe 10 years ago. I wanted see what the fuss had been about. The reputation was larger than the movie.
          The picture seemed muddled, and like Bob I couldn't connect with it. Still, "Easy Rider" had an impact on our culture beyond its quality as a movie. The title itself has entered our language.
          The ending was shocking -- I won't give it away in case others are as dilatory about watching it as I was. By that ending, the film recalled for me the inexplicable hatred some Americans felt toward "hippies." To many in our country, they posed a threat to society. That was ironic, because peace was a central tenet of flower children.
          I ask you, do these guys look dangerous?



          Some Americans are always looking for a person or group that allows them to feel superior. And some Americans are hoping for an excuse to engage in violence. That's what I mean about a film resonating with its era. "Easy Rider" did that, but today seems like an artifact.
          I agree with Bob that "Casablanca" feels as fresh and absorbing as the day it was made in 1942. That may be because some of us lived through the events it depicts. Even so, "Casablanca" touches on eternal themes: the love of a man and woman, bravery in the face of impossible odds, the evil of a dictatorial movement, self-sacrifice, and the value of letters of transit.
          Here's some of that celluloid love:

 
          Don't fret, Ingrid, we'll always have Burbank.

          JAY JOHNSON writes:
          Agree with Bob about "Easy Rider". (AP style ... period within or outside quote marks?)
          I loved "Blazing Saddles" when it came out in 1974 (I was 19). Rented it a couple of years ago and found it unfunny and unwatchable.
          Movies I'll watch every time they're on: "Casablanca" (Again, I'm with you Bob!); "The Treasure of the Sierra Madre"; and "Groundhog Day".
          I now rate Clint Eastwood as the #1 Hollywood icon of all time, just ahead of Humphrey Bogart. Rewatching the "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly" a few months ago was a joy. It's gotten better with time. The "three-way standoff" is the most perfect 2:40 of dialogue-free movie-making ever.

-------------------------------------------------------------

          MICHELE DAVIS writes:
          Jack, you are correct in assuming that the birthday holiday was a Guild-negotiated benefit.
          You are wrong in your statement that "when a labor union is involved, an employer can't just do that on his or her own."
          The labor contract sets MINIMUMS. The employer was always free to go above and beyond the minimums and give employees extra money, etc. The contract set minimums for pay but we all know of employees who were paid far above the minimum. This did not require Guild approval in any way. Of course, I do know of several management types who lied to employees about not being able to pay them more because of the Guild contract. That worked until the employees called the Guild office and were told that was not the case.
          I was interested in the "pink card" choice. I never heard of that one before.

          REBER: An employee who worked a holiday (birthday, Christmas, etc.) was paid time and a half. If, however, that holiday fell on your day off you were given the choice of an extra day’s pay or a day off at another time.
          You’re correct in what you wrote. Here’s an example of what I was thinking about:
          An employee with the very best intentions was trying to help employees make better use of the U-T gym. She put out a questionnaire to all employees which essentially asked them to vote on such questions as “Would you like an extra half-hour lunch break?” “Would you like an additional break, besides lunch, during your shift?” “Would it be helpful if people in your department worked staggered shifts?” It was a really long questionnaire of similar questions. This woman wasn’t a manager, but she was representing the company regarding the gym.
          In effect (although not consciously) she was negotiating with employees outside the union framework, essentially ignoring the union, and that’s a good way to wind up with people carrying signs marching in front of your building. Her questionnaire never made it to wide distribution. I think only newsroom people saw it before it was squelched.  

          DIANE KIESEL writes:
          I was very interested to read that U-T employees got “birthday holidays.” I worked in the Washington D.C. Copley bureau between 1978 and 1982 and all I recall receiving was a birthday card each year signed by David Copley.

          REBER: I can’t recall when the birthday holiday started. Might have been after 1982.

----------------------------------------------------------

          BRIAN CLARK writes:
          I, too, have a Yashica twin-lens camera story to tell and a scar to go with it. I grew up in a newspaper family in rural, eastern Iowa. Somewhere along the line in high school, I was photographing a basketball game for the town weekly - underneath and just a foot or two to the rear of the backboard. Someone shot a hard pass to a player headed for the basket. It bounced off his fingers and hit the camera, shoving it up into my face. The metal plates that pop up on top of the camera are thin and gouged the skin near might right eye. Fortunately, the eyeball remained untouched. So all I got was a minor battle scar. I forget who won the game. I was able to cover games because I did not play hoops. My little school had an indoor pool - something of a rarity - so I was on the swim team as a freestyler and butterflyer. Doing the freestyle, a.k.a. the “crawl,” is much easier. Anyway, I continued to shoot basketball games and was never hurt again. I did not, however, photograph any swim meets.

          REBER: The creepy-handed editor is at it again. Brian, I made a change if your copy that is nothing more than a wild guess. Please let me know if I guessed wrong. I miss the old days when you could just yell across the room and ask someone for clarification.

----------------------------------------------------

          CECIL SCAGLIONE writes:
          For anyone interested, we’ve moved…to Aridzona. Why leave Pacific Beach, one of the prime spots on the globe? Primarily to be close to the grandkids and dump the hurtling taxes, traffic, crowding, costs and regulations in California. PB hasn’t been much fun for the past couple of years. We’ll keep in touch with all of you through Mr. Reber’s dedication.

-------------------------------------------------

          DAVID FARMER writes:
          Have you ever thought up a good wisecrack, but had no occasion to use it? Waited sometimes for years for a chance to crack wise? Decided you'd probably die, leaving it unspoken? Considered inserting a clause in your will instructing your executor to deliver the remark on the right occasion? I've been waiting since 1993 to deliver mine. And today came the blessed opportunity.*
          I was descending in an elevator at my local Ralphs with a young guy and girl, clearly a couple. They must have had some kind of folie a deux, because they started talking about the elevator we were in. He pointed out that it was made by Otis. She said that's the brand she sees most. They chattered on that way until we reached the parking lot and got out.
          I started to walk to my car, but thought, You fool. You're missing probably the only chance in your life to deliver your wisecrack to consenting adults. So I caught up to the couple and told them:
          "Schindler makes an elevator. In Europe it's called Schindler's Lift." They chuckled appreciatively and we parted without another word. But I was so relieved to get the remark off my chest after 24 years.
          Of course, 1993 refers to the year the famous Liam Neeson movie came out. I forget the title, but somewhere in the film there's a reference to a list being prepared by a man named Schuster. But that's so long ago, and my memory is failing.
          *Some of the facts in here are factual, including the name of the lift Liam used to ride in. Okay, that's the only real fact, along with the young couple. But some locations have been altered, characters combined, and actions created for dramatic effect. (All right, it was very difficult to change those things given that they all occurred during one 15-second elevator ride.) I think if I write a screenplay about it, I'll call it "Fifteen Seconds over Ralphs."

----------------------------------------------------------------

          PHIL McMAHAN writes:
          Jack, your comment about you turning 40 in a couple of months begs the question, is your contribution to fake news?

          REBER: You decide, Phil. If you believe it, it’s fake news. If you don’t believe it, it’s not news, fake or otherwise, at all.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

          DAVID FARMER forwards:
          This article features just about the cleverest graphic I've ever seen.


P.O. Box 2239
Ramona, CA 92065
U.S.A.